CCTV footage captured Jessica’s conduct with the café ahead of Mirna’s arrival, which prosecutors later claimed showed suspicious exercise.

From minimal CCTV footage towards the toxicology examination done 70 minutes right after Salihin's Demise, which disclosed no traces of cyanide in her urine, liver, gastric fluid or bile - it was only numerous times just after her Loss of life that smaller traces of cyanide ended up located in her tummy fluid.

Amid a developing humanitarian disaster, the personal accounts of two Rohingya Girls illuminate the profound struggles confronted by those escaping the turmoil in Rakhine.

Critically the movie was gained rather positively with publications such as Diplomat stating, "Though the Tale polarized Indonesia, with supporters forming groups in favor of both Wongso or Salihin, time which has ensued since the conviction has permitted for the calmer and cooler critique with the gatherings that transpired, a thing that the new Netflix documentary aims to attain."[14]

Jessica Wongso’s demo in mid-2016 drew unparalleled community focus. Over 4 months, prosecutors argued that Jessica meticulously planned the murder, allegedly purchasing cyanide and spiking Mirna’s coffee just before she arrived at the café.

This resulted in general public speculation that Jessica Wongso was not the killer and was forcibly imprisoned.[21] The speculation later was countered by Edward "Eddy" Omar Sharif Hiariej, a professor at Faculty of Legislation of Gadjah Mada University and qualified witness in the trial of the case, who mentioned that Jessica is Plainly the murderer by like proof from 9 CCTV recordings and two expert witnesses.[22] He also added that resulting from the likelihood principle that he applied along with I Produced Gelgel to learn once the cyanide was put in to the glass, he stated that all the witnesses had been in the exact same put and only saw Jessica near the espresso.

The scene when Jessica Wongso was forbidden from accomplishing an interview in prison became trending on the internet, having said that Ministry of Law illustration, Rika Aprianti, claimed that they didn't been given an interview permission through the movie crew.[fifteen] A assert which was later on closely questioned as difficult by netizens. Mirna's father, Edi Darmawan Slot online Wongsobet Salihin, experienced received a major Highlight as a consequence of this movie with couple people discussing his very own controversy, for example: womanizing, trying to keep a bottle of cyanide, and insulting Wongso's temperament which his more info staff members included that his temperament adjusted just after Mirna's death and resulted in enormous layoffs of his personnel.

People today had been queuing outside the house the Jakarta central courtroom from before dawn to acquire a seat to witness The decision In this particular murder demo that gripped the nation. Some in the gang had travelled from other read more islands just be below.

Australian law enforcement agreed to assist Indonesian police with their investigation after receiving assurances that she would not be handed the death penalty.

CCTV footage gaps: Even with promises of Jessica performing suspiciously, Wongsobet terbaru the footage lacked conclusive evidence of tampering.

She died minutes right after sipping a espresso purchased by her Mate. An autopsy located traces of cyanide in her entire body.

Toxicologist Slamet Purnomo exposed no autopsy was carried out as a result of Salihins only permitting a sampling of the stomach; thus, any alternate results in of Dying can't be examined. Djaja Surya Atmadja, a forensic pathologist, testified that 70 minutes adhering to her Loss of life, her stomach analyzed detrimental for cyanide.

Bagi Rusmadi, Awang Faroek adalah sosok pemimpin yang tidak hanya berjasa besar dalam pembangunan infrastruktur, tetapi juga memiliki visi besar untuk meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia di Kaltim.

The documentary casts question on key elements from the prosecution’s check here narrative, elevating unpleasant concerns: Did media bias prejudice the trial? Was the evidence too weak for a conviction? Did general public opinion tension the judiciary?